After the single-location film exercise, our final microfilm went through extensive revision based on feedback from our instructor and classmates. We redesigned parts of the storyboard, replaced several scenes, and adjusted shot choices to make the narrative clearer and more engaging.

One major change involved sound recording. Outdoor filming created background noise and inconsistent audio quality, so we moved the production entirely indoors. This significantly improved sound clarity and overall production quality. We also followed the 180-degree rule more carefully during shot–reverse-shot sequences, maintaining consistent spatial relationships between the characters.

We switched from a single-camera setup to two cameras, which allowed us to capture different shot sizes simultaneously and provided more options during editing. However, differences in lighting and exposure created inconsistent color tones, while one camera produced noticeable image noise.

Our cinematography also reflected the characters’ personalities. Reef, a troubled teenager, was mainly filmed with unstable handheld shots to express tension and emotional unrest. In contrast, Donald, a calm counselor, was shown through stable, fixed shots. We limited complex camera movements because the boom microphone or sound operator sometimes appeared in the frame.

Overall, the final film demonstrates clear improvement in storytelling and technical execution. Through teamwork, feedback, and continuous revision, we achieved a satisfying result and gained valuable filmmaking experience.